AIRPORT CLIMATE SCAMMING

During last month's heatwave, Richey discussed the rampant climate scamming that now customarily accompanies any kind of inclement weather.  Part of the climate scammers' agenda in hot weather is to show that record temperatures have been recorded somewhere.  Quite often they record these 'record temperatures' at Heathrow, or some obscure place that shares something in common with Heathrow - an airport.  The scammers don't provide an exact location and never mention the airport.

For example, last week the BBC reported daily 'record temperatures'.  The first of which was simply reported as 'Gosport' in Hampshire, while the second one was 'Merryfield' in Somerset.  No mention was given to the general aviation airport in Gosport or the RAF airbase at Merryfield.

What do airports and airbases provide in hot weather?  Extraordinarily hot temperatures, as miles of unsheltered tarmac, concrete and asphalt soak up the rays of the sun to create an island of tropical heat.

Richey discussed the airport scamming briefly last week, albeit he incorrectly refers to the heat effect as a 'vacuum', which is not scientifically correct.  Watch below (three minute watch).

Climate scamming is not restricted to the UK, naturally.  The climate agenda is pushed by the same globalists that have taken control of nearly every Western nation.  So when a record temperature was recorded in Germany last week - at the city of Saarbrücken - imagine our lack of surprise to find that said city also has an airport.

Question everything.

NOWT TO DO WITH CHILDREN'S SAFETY

Several days ago Keir Starmer gave tech companies an 'ultimatum' - either they block explicit images from children's devices or face legislation to enforce it.  It was a smokescreen.  Starmer was always going to introduce that legislation regardless.

He can say that his proposed social media ban is about 'children's safety', but once again he is lying.  He and his progressive Fabian ilk have repeatedly thrown our children under the bus - whether it be through Muslim rape gangs and imported migrant violence, or the degenerate filth of gay adoptions and alphabet education.

Put bluntly, Keir Starmer couldn't give a flying fuck about children's safety.  This is about controlling the internet and what information we are allowed to digest.  The society he and his predecessors have created is falling apart at the seams and he doesn't want anyone, not least impressionable youngsters, waking up to the harsh realities just in time to vote when they reach 16.

That is why Bluesky - the left-wing social media echo chamber that was created in response to Elon's purchase of Twitter and its transformation into the free speech platform X - will reportedly be exempt from the social media ban.  Bluesky has well documented problems with explicit images and paedophilia, so how can this ban possibly be about 'children's safety' if this conveniently left-wing platform is exempt?

That's because the ban has nothing to do with children's safety.  The dystopian plans Starmer and his handlers have in mind come straight from the pages of Nineteen Eighty-Four - which has been adapted into totalitarian globalist objectives found in the World Economic Forum's 'Fourth Industrial Revolution' and the United Nations Sustainable Goals (aka Agenda 2030).

We are talking about a mandatory digital ID system that will impose total state control of every corner of our lives.  We must resist every step they take to achieve this scenario at all costs.

Richey has done a short piece to camera on Starmer's two tier ban, watch below (two minute watch).

It's not about safety, it's about control.

WHAT IF ED WON (AGAIN)

In his final video filmed over the Bank Holiday weekend, Richey discusses the potential Labour leadership election that haunts Starmer's troubled premiership.  Burnham remains odds on favourite to succeed Starmer across betting markets, followed by Rayner, Miliband and Streeting.

Ladbrokes are currently offering the following odds.

Andy Burnham 4/9

Angela Rayner 6/1

Ed Miliband 11/1

Wes Streeting 14/1

Alistair Carns 20/1

Shabana Mahmood 40/1 

Yvette Cooper 50/1

Watch below or on YouTube (five minute watch)

Of course the Ed Miliband scenario discussed by Richey, can only come about if both he and Burnham stand.  Burnham has to win Makerfield and there are currently no indications as to whether Miliband plans to enter the fray.

CLIMATE SCAMMING OVERDRIVE

In the second of three videos filmed over Bank Holiday weekend, Richey discusses the rampant climate scamming that is currently being deployed by the media.  The attempt to invoke hysteria over a spell of hot weather is all about the globalist agenda for complete control over humanity.  Don't be fooled.

Watch below (seven minute watch)

And right on cue, as Richey discussed, the climate scammers have today used Heathrow yet again to report a 'record breaking temperature'.  Don't be fooled.

ANDY FOR HIMSELF

Richey has been out enjoying the sunshine and recording his insights along the way.  In the first of three videos, here he discusses the travesty that is Andy Burnham - who may well be our next Prime Minister.

Watch below or on YouTube (five minute watch)

Nominations for the Makerfield by-election close on Tuesday at 16:00.  At this moment in time, the Green Party do not have a candidate, as their first choice dropped out on the same day they announced his candidacy.  There are calls from within the party to stand down in order to give Burnham a free run, so Reform will be holding their breath and hoping they do not.  Chances of a Reform victory have already been damaged by Rupert Lowe's decision to debut in Makerfield, so for the Greens to pull out at this late stage certainly won't help their chances.

We said people should be careful for what they wish for, and Burnham's succession of Starmer could be the turning point that resuscitates a party that was not just on life support - it was close to death.

RICHEY'S ELECTION REVIEW

Due to a combination of work commitments, illness and the absurdly staggered timing of election counts, we could not pull an all nighter on Thursday - as we have in the past.  The process of counting votes and then declaring results a few hours after the polls close seems to be getting more scarce in recent years.  This week the overwhelming majority of English councils joined Scotland and Wales in deferring their counts until the following day.  This rendered an 'all nighter' pointless and with work commitments standing in Karl's way and illness hindering Richey, a full programme of coverage on this website was very difficult indeed.

Instead, we tried our best to cover the election on our social media accounts and succeeded in communicating the main points, which resulted in impressive distribution and engagement.  In place of our usual election coverage on binlabour.com, Richey has recorded a video review - under difficult circumstances.  He is currently suffering from a horrendous cough that has lingered from a recent chest infection, not helped by little sleep during these staggered election counts.  Multiple takes due to this cough delayed the release of the video.  By the time Karl had received and edited the files, the election and its fallout had progressed further.  Therefore, the declarations of Bradford City Council and Tower Hamlets had come and gone by the time the video was posted.  The Catherine West ultimatum had also come and gone.

Regardless, the review is still relevant and you are welcome to watch below (18 minute watch)

If you appreciate what we do - in dedicating a significant (and often unhealthy) amount of our spare time to this campaign - please consider visiting this website and bunging us a few quid.  With millions of hits on our website and over a hundred thousand followers on social media, it sure can feel like we are wholly unappreciated most of the time.  It costs money as well as time to do this, so please support us.

Thank you.

THE UXBRIDGE/GOLDERS GREEN DISPARITY

The stabbing rampage against Jews in Golders Green has provoked a massive response from the state and Keir Starmer in particular.  Shamefully, when an Afghan migrant went on a stabbing spree elsewhere in London last year, the response was a deafening silence from our Prime Minister.  That despicable triple attack resulted in a brutal murder - that of innocent dog walker Wayne Broadhurst - something which did not even constitute a Wikipedia entry.  Starmer said nothing, Sadiq Khan said nothing, Labour said nothing.

Contrast with Golders Green, where two people were stabbed and no-one died, but which has been designated a 'terror attack' and sparked a COBRA meeting, a press conference and a visit to the scene of the crime by Two Tier Keir.

Richey's thoughts on this disparity can be seen below (five minute watch)

HM PRISON ABOLITION

Pink-haired weirdo Kate Nevens is one of the Green candidates for the Scottish Parliament regional list of Edinburgh and Lothians East.  In a campaign video posted to her Bluesky account (where else?) she discusses her desire to abolish the prison system: "Prisons are not safe, they're violent and they're poor for people's wellbeing".  Er, yeah, they're full of criminals you muppet.  They are where we send people who have been very, very naughty - as a punishment, a deterrent and to keep the rest of us safe.  Every single country on this planet has a prison system.

Prisons are not meant to be pleasant holiday homes you wet liberal, that would defeat their very purpose.  Needless to say, Kate is from the same university-educated class that turns a blind eye to all manner of crime, with the exception of the thought crimes they refer to as 'hate speech'.  As well as legalising hard drugs, she would probably decriminalise rape gangs in the name of progress and atonement for the colonial spread of the British Empire.

Watch Kate's prison pitch below, with Richey's input (four minute watch).

The Green Party is polling nationally at 16 per cent, level with Labour, according to the most recent YouGov poll,

HAPPY EASTER

We had no plans for an Easter video this year, but then Richey's girlfriend surprises him with the generic chocolate eggs (again).  A hastily produced video ensued...

AFTER GORTON & DENTON

The dust is beginning to settle in Greater Manchester and our own Richey Edwards has delivered some thoughts on the future for Labour, Reform and the Greens.

Watch below (25 minute watch)

THE GREEN TROJAN HORSE

The Green Party has been heavily pushed by legacy media in recent months, so far with little to show for the effort.  Each Thursday their electoral returns in council by-elections have not lived up to the 'Green surge' we are being sold.  Their share of the vote remains fairly flat, in fact it's quite often down, and that's in the few seats that the party bothers to contest.  Then out of nowhere came an impressive victory in Leicester last Thursday.

The last time voters went to the polls in Stoneygate ward, the Greens finished last, behind Labour, the Tories, independents and Lib Dems.  That was three years ago.  Last week they bested all comers, including Reform, and did indeed 'surge' to first place.  What made Stoneygate special, so different?

The list of names on the ballot paper should provide a clue.  From a field of eight candidates, six were of south Asian descent.  The last census showed Stoneygate with a 63 per cent Muslim majority.  The Greens' success here was built on sectarian politics, something they hope to exploit again in Gorton and Denton this Thursday.

While the Muslim population of the Manchester constituency stood at less than 30 per cent in the same census, if we know anything about that community at all it is their ability to put a cross on a ballot paper.  'Even dead Muslims vote' is a common phrase on the campaign trail in such Balkanised towns, a reference to decades of fraudulent voting patterns.  This is why the left are always opposed to voter ID, despite being largely in favour of every other type of ID.

While Muslim settlers have flirted with other parties in the past, it has generally been sporadic and short-lived.  George Galloway has tried to exploit the Muslim vote with multiple parties and got himself back on the Westminster gravy train twice - first through Respect and later the Workers Party of Britain.  Now the Greens are getting in on the act, appealing to Islamist discontent with Labour's perceived failure to support the Palestinian cause.

In Gorton and Denton they have cynically targeted such grievances.  One leaflet features candidate Hannah Spencer stood in front of a local mosque and 'STOP ISLAMOPHOBIA' written in bold letters.  The reverse side of the leaflet contains a series of punchy slogans written only in Urdu.  The national language of Pakistan has also been used in a social media video promoting the Greens, albeit you'll be hard pushed to find any references to their progressive liberal policies.  The video plays to a victimhood mentality in the community, showing images of Home Office detentions, ICE detentions (in the US), the summer riots of 2024, references to 'Islamophobia' and demonising Labour over Gaza and Reform over 'racism'.

The video is discussed by Richey in the following YouTube video (five minute watch).

Whether the Greens have successfully persuaded enough Muslims to swing the vote in their favour will be revealed in the early hours of Friday.  They remain odds on favourites across betting markets and lead Reform by four points in one poll, while they are in a dead heat with Labour in another.

The Balkanisation of our country, in particular the towns and cities where more than half of our parliamentary constituencies reside, does not bode well for a cohesive democracy.  Diversity is not strength, no matter how many times the left-leaning establishment bang that propaganda drum.  A victory for the Greens in Gorton and Denton will not serve the establishment, it will provide a spring board for an Islamist trojan horse that will ultimately sweep away our democracy, and along with it all those progressive values that the Green Party and other hard left parties dote on.

LITTLE OWEN LANDS

Everyone's favourite little lefty gobshite has landed in Gorton and Denton for the big by-election.  The Guardian's Owen Jones has shifted his allegiance yet again recently, this time to the Greens, who have overtaken Reform to be the favourites to take the seat on Thursday.

In between campaigning for the open borders lunatics, he has been making videos for his social media followers.  Two days ago he posted a 25 minute video that mostly consisted of vox pop type interviews he'd made with constituents in the street.  He singled one such segment for a post on his social media channels that smacked of the condescending attitude we have come to associate with legacy media hacks.

Despite a plethora of intriguing responses and a variety of endorsements for the three main contenders in Gorton and Denton, the wee man honed in on a short exchange with one particular voter.

Watch below, with Richey's commentary.

Kudos to this lady, she came off eminently better in this clip than little Owen, who doesn't appreciate that small gestures matter a lot to ordinary people.  Manners and etiquette are still important to some folk in the godless debauched anything-goes society promoted by leftists like Jones.  The great irony is that the working classes will be the downfall of an ideology that was founded in their name.  Bourgeois twats like Jones will never comprehend that, as they exist purely in a middle class echo chamber that regards the proletariat with the same kind of disdain they would show towards a piece of dog shit they have stepped in.

The people are rising little man, and regardless of the result in Gorton and Denton they will not swing left.

IS THIS REALLY BURNHAM'S CHANCE?

by Richey Edwards

Disgraced former minister Andrew Gwynne has sensationally decided to quit Westminster, ostensibly 'on doctor's orders' due to what he has strongly insinuated is a mental health problem.  He is reported to have quit only after he secured a lucrative pension deal with Commons authorities.  Gwynne's departure creates a potential route to the Labour leadership challenge prized by the Mayor of Greater Manchester.  On the face of it, Gwynne's Greater Manchester constituency of Gorton and Denton appears to be the perfect vehicle for Andy Burnham to achieve his ultimate goal of replacing Starmer in Number Ten.

However, it won't be that simple, and a significant amount of factors come into play before Burnham 

even gets close to challenging Starmer for the top job.

For Burnham to challenge Starmer, he firstly has to get himself back into the Commons as a Labour MP.  As the self-styled 'King in the North', Burnham will favour a northern seat in order to achieve this, and for a vacancy to arise in Greater Manchester - with a solid existing Labour majority of 13,413 - he is unlikely to get a better opportunity in this parliament.

This could end in humiliating fashion for Burnham, should he go for it.  Failing to get through the selection process wouldn't be the biggest embarrassment, but getting the nod and then failing to hold the seat would be truly humbling, potentially career ending.  What would traditionally be considered a Labour 'safe' seat is no longer safe.  The old political order is crumbling, the game has changed and there is every chance that either Reform or the Greens could dislodge Labour in this forthcoming by-election.

Gorton and Denton, 2024 general election

Andrew Gwynne (Lab) 18,555 (50.8%) -16.4%

Lee Moffitt (Ref) 5,142 (14.1%) +9.2%

Amanda Gardner (Grn) 4,810 (13.2%) +10.7%

Amir Burney (WPB) 3,766 (10.3%) New

Ruth Welsh (Con) 2,888 (7.9%) -11.0%

John Reid (LDm) 1,399 (3.8%) -2.0%

As you can see, there was already a swing away from Labour in 2024, with the benefactors being a combination of Reform, the Greens and Workers Party.  The swing will be even greater this time round, which will bring both Reform and the Greens closer to victory.  The seat is more likely to favour Reform and we would expect the contest to be very tight.

Failure to hold this seat would provide yet another example of how far Labour have slumped in less than two years of government.  Gorton and Denton was created by boundary changes in 2024, but most of the land from which it was amalgamated has been held by Labour for decades.  The new seat took around half of its territory from Manchester Gorton, a seat held by Labour since 1935.  Denton and Reddish - the seat held by Gwynne prior to the boundary change - was held by Labour since its own creation back in 1983.  Manchester Withington had a Lib Dem MP from 2005 to 2015, after which it was taken back by Labour, who had previously held the seat since 1987.

Losing a seat like Gorton and Denton would be hard to bear for such a high profile ego as the 'King in the North'.  The stakes could not be higher and Burnham's well publicised desire to challenge Starmer could rob him of vital activists during a campaign in which he would need to throw the kitchen sink.  A split in support could also prevent him from winning selection, but he may not even get that far.  An elected mayor has to get special permission from the party to contest a Westminster seat, which could be denied.  He could resign his mayoralty in order to work around this first obstacle, but that would be seen in a very poor light and could hinder him in later stages, when he will need to call upon the local CLP, MPs and party members for support.

Now let's say that Burnham gets approval to run, wins selection and then successfully holds the seat for Labour.  Having re-entered the House of Commons as an MP, he will have a new set of obstacles to get what he ultimately desires.  Firstly, there needs to be a will to replace Starmer.  While Starmer is perceived by the majority of the electorate as a catastrophic disaster, Labour's polling has improved in recent polls.  YouGov now has Labour back in second place behind Reform, having halved Reform's poll lead from 10 points to five in just a month.  It's doubtful that Starmer can keep up this momentum, and there is a potentially very embarrassing trial looming large in April, involving three young 'aspiring male models' from eastern Europe.

Leadership challenges are usually born out of discontent, much of which is orchestrated.  However, in order to sow dissent successfully, plotters need negative circumstances.  This wasn't a problem when Jeremy Corbyn's leadership was stumbling in 2016.  Negative publicity, poor polling and a desire to scapegoat Corbyn for the EU referendum result, all combined to create the negative circumstances required to launch a leadership challenge, aided by the loss of a no confidence vote and a string of resignations from his shadow front bench.

Corbyn easily survived the leadership challenge from little known backbencher Owen Smith and went on to exceed expectations in Theresa May's absurd snap general election of 2017.  Taking the Tory majority away meant that Brexit could be stalled indefinitely and this saved Corbyn's leadership from any further attempts to mount a challenge.

Burnham could try and mount a challenge without significant negative circumstances, but it would not be wise.  If Starmer is seen to have steadied the ship after a disastrous 2025, MPs would be less inclined to support a challenge.  Unpopular leaders are much easier to dislodge.  Burnham would be best equipped to bide his time, but not too much time as his slim chances of rescuing Labour's majority diminishes the closer the end of the parliamentary term.  He would need to sow a little dissent in the ranks, but not too much as no-one likes a concerted plotter.  It's a tightrope.

Alternatively, he could wait for another plotter to come along and allow them to do the ground work in triggering a challenge and then jump on the ballot paper.  Either way, Burnham would have to canvass and gain the support of 20 per cent of the Parliamentary Labour Party in order to get on the ballot.  This is double the threshold since the last leadership challenge, the party having voted to increase it from 10 per cent in 2021.  Having achieved that, the challenger then has to secure nominations from five per cent of Constituency Labour Parties and/or Labour affiliates such as trades unions.

If Burnham succeeded in mounting a solo challenge, the party would be entering new territory and the self-styled King would be making history, regardless of whether or not he defeats Starmer in the ballot.  No Labour Prime Minister has ever faced a leadership challenge, let alone one in which a fifth of Labour MPs are required to turn on the incumbent.

The ultimate question is then answered by the Labour membership and affiliate supporters - stick with Starmer or take the plunge with Burnham?  It's anyone's guess as to which way that would go.

The whole process from start to finish is an exceptionally tall order for Burnham and he may choose to duck out from the off.  The possibilities may be too tempting to miss out, but of course he would need to get that special permission first.  At the time of writing, he has said precisely nothing about Gwynne's departure.

As for Andrew Gwynne, he may still yet be remembered as the man who made it possible for Burnham to dislodge Starmer, but he is more likely to go down in history for the WhatsApp scandal.  And quite rightly so!

TRUMP'S ULTIMATE STARMER SNUB

Keir Starmer may well be regretting his dash to Egypt for Donald Trump's victory lap, after the US president brokered a peace deal in Gaza.  He will certainly be regretting his decision to stand behind the President as he addressed various world leaders and representatives.  If Starmer had wanted to get himself some limelight - for doing absolutely nothing to deliver said peace - he succeeded in one respect.  He became the main talking point stemming from the 45 minute conference.

Richey breaks it down below.

Our nation salutes you Mr President.  Long may your shoddy treatment of our tin pot tyrant continue!

UNITE AGAINST DIGITAL FASCISM

The gloves are off, Tony Blair has confirmed that a mandatory digital ID is to be introduced in the UK.  Did we say Tony Blair?  Oops sorry, slip of the tongue.  Puppet PM Keir Starmer made the announcement on Friday, channeling all the sinister air of his master:  "Let me spell it out - you will not be able to work in the United Kingdom if you do not have digital ID - it's as simple as that".

The introduction of a digital ID was inevitable and we have been warning about it for years.  It may of course take years to introduce, time that Starmer may not have if the opinion polls are vaguely accurate.

Needless to say, the new scheme has nothing to do with illegal migration or illegal working, as it will solve neither.  People working illegally tend to get paid in cash, but don't worry, because the government already has a backup plan - the introduction of a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) to replace cash.  Once that happens, all the liberty and privacy we have ever taken for granted is taken by the state.

These things were not won cheap and we owe it to our ancestors to fight this first step on the ladder towards a CCP-style social credit system.  It's as simple as that Mr Starmer. 

Richey made his thoughts known in this video late last night.

If Starmer has achieved anything with this announcement, it is the hammering of the final nail in his own political coffin.  He has managed to unite the left and right of the political divide - from Jeremy Corbyn to Nigel Farage - against Blair's dystopian plot.  As we embark on the fight of our lives, we may find ourselves alongside some unusual bedfellows, but perhaps this may end up being Starmer's greatest achievement in office...

He united the entire country.  Against him.

THE BLANGO-SAXONS

The trailer for the BBC's King & Conqueror starts well and has two solid leads in the roles of King Harold and William the Conqueror.  They are both white Europeans and as the trailer progresses, it appears that the Beeb has bucked the trend of the woke nonsense pervading 21st century depictions of our rich and distinctly European history.

Then, near the end of the trailer, the Battle of Hastings ensues with a brief glimpse of one of the 'Anglo-Saxons' demolishing the illusion of normality.  Turns out that King & Conqueror is just the same old cultural Marxist rubbish from the same broadcaster that depicted Sir Isaac Newton as an Asian man in a Doctor Who episode.

What can we do to counter this historical revisionism?  Don't watch.  Turn off and complain.

The people who run Hollywood have been pushing this political agenda for some years now and it has resulted in empty cinemas and diminishing returns.  If they don't change course and return to entertaining instead of indoctrinating, their industry will die.

Just like the Beeb's very own Doctor Who.  Get woke, go broke.

DIGITAL ID: A THREAT TO US ALL

When they tell you digital ID is required for 'your own convenience', in order to 'make your life easier', they are lying.  When they tell you it is required to tackle benefit fraud and to centralise NHS services, they are lying.  When they tell you it is required to control immigration, they are lying.

The agents of Davos are trying to sell you a mandatory programme that will totally crush every single freedom you have ever taken for granted.  Tied to a Central Bank Digital Currency in a cashless society you will become nothing more than a worthless automaton who cannot speak or think freely, while the state watches and controls your every move.  You can also wave goodbye to your privacy if you stand idly by and allow them to impose this Orwellian society upon us.

We the people of the United Kingdom have survived for the entirety of our existence without having mandatory identification, save for temporary measures such as those rolled out during the Second World War.  However, the plan laid out in the globalist agenda is not meant to be temporary - your life will be theirs, forever.

Richey sums up the basics in the video below.

Back in April more than 40 'centrist' Labour MPs published an open letter setting out various arguments for the imposition of a digital ID - including the control of illegal migration.  Since when do Labour MPs care about controlling immigration?  They don't, it is merely one selling point in order to persuade you to accept their globalist agenda.  The letter was probably written by Tony Blair himself, it certainly has the stench of his Davos lies.

The letter also refers to 'extensive polling', but we can only find one - from polling organisation More in Common.  That poll found 53 per cent in favour of digital IDs, but this was carried out in December 2024, long before the Online Safety Act came into being and elite police squads were being tasked with policing our speech.  And there's another problem - More in Common is funded by the same organisations that are pushing digital IDS, including none other than the Open Society Foundation of George Soros - one of the most despicable men who has ever walked this earth.

The digital ID being considered by Keir Starmer is tentatively titled 'BritCard'.  The roll out of BritCard - whether it be voluntary or mandatory - will be the first step on a road to the total abolition of freedom.  Please do not let this happen.

BRITANNIA FIRST

The lush Britannia International Hotel in Canary Wharf has become one of the latest venues for the boat people, who were snuck in to their new four star accommodation in the early hours of Saturday morning - despite previous assurances to the contrary.  Richey discusses the latest outrage in our latest YouTube video (watch below).

If you would like us to continue making videos, you can chip in here.

A FRUIT & NUT REVENGE

Jeremy Corbyn was reportedly not best pleased when brash young MP Zarah Sultana blurted out the news about a new hard left party on the horizon.  The official announcement came some weeks later and was distinctly underwhelming.  There was no party name, with an interim title given as 'Your Party'.  Therefore, those of us who have been referring to it simply as 'Fruit and Nut' (Sultana the fruit and you know the rest) have no choice but to continue doing so for the foreseeable future.

Hence, in the YouTube video below, Richey refers to Fruit and Nut throughout.  This is our shared analysis of the dire threat that - combined with the rise of Reform UK - Corbyn's new venture poses to Keir Starmer and his odious party...

Further to the video, you may have seen bold claims that despite its embryonic stage, Fruit and Nut have surged past Reform UK and every other party in terms of membership.  This is simply not true, as technically the new party has zero members.  People have been invited to 'sign up' on a web page, but this is not the same as membership.  No fees are paid, no cards are handed out, those who 'sign up' merely join a mailing list.  The party has not even been registered with the Electoral Commission.

Those on the left getting excited by the media buzz will be sorely disappointed in the short term.  They are not going to enjoy the same surge in support that Reform UK has recently.  Fruit and Nut will only appeal to certain demographics as discussed in the above video.  They will not be winning council by-elections all over the place any time soon, but combined with the rise of Reform they absolutely will present a major threat to Labour's parliamentary majority when it comes to a general election.

There is a political shift happening.  We live in interesting times.

ROYAL WELSH POLITICAL ANIMAL

Earlier this week Richey attended the Royal Welsh Show with his partner and spoke with various activists on our wavelength, while Labour kept a low profile.  He summed up his observations in the following YouTube video...

While Kemi Badenoch, Nigel Farage and Rhun ap Iorwerth (Plaid Cymu) attended the show this year, they were the only major national party leaders to do so.  Starmer could not possibly have attended, even if he had wanted to, on safety grounds.  Labour's disgusting treatment of farmers meant that he would have been given a frosty reception at best.  Likewise, we can find no record of a Green Party presence, which sums up their own hard left attitude to agriculture.

In fairness, First Minister Eluned Morgan was in attendance, although she appears to have been kept away from the public as much as possible - not that many people would recognise her in any case.  She must be the most anonymous First Minister since devolution began!