NOWT TO DO WITH CHILDREN'S SAFETY

Several days ago Keir Starmer gave tech companies an 'ultimatum' - either they block explicit images from children's devices or face legislation to enforce it.  It was a smokescreen.  Starmer was always going to introduce that legislation regardless.

He can say that his proposed social media ban is about 'children's safety', but once again he is lying.  He and his progressive Fabian ilk have repeatedly thrown our children under the bus - whether it be through Muslim rape gangs and imported migrant violence, or the degenerate filth of gay adoptions and alphabet education.

Put bluntly, Keir Starmer couldn't give a flying fuck about children's safety.  This is about controlling the internet and what information we are allowed to digest.  The society he and his predecessors have created is falling apart at the seams and he doesn't want anyone, not least impressionable youngsters, waking up to the harsh realities just in time to vote when they reach 16.

That is why Bluesky - the left-wing social media echo chamber that was created in response to Elon's purchase of Twitter and its transformation into the free speech platform X - will reportedly be exempt from the social media ban.  Bluesky has well documented problems with explicit images and paedophilia, so how can this ban possibly be about 'children's safety' if this conveniently left-wing platform is exempt?

That's because the ban has nothing to do with children's safety.  The dystopian plans Starmer and his handlers have in mind come straight from the pages of Nineteen Eighty-Four - which has been adapted into totalitarian globalist objectives found in the World Economic Forum's 'Fourth Industrial Revolution' and the United Nations Sustainable Goals (aka Agenda 2030).

We are talking about a mandatory digital ID system that will impose total state control of every corner of our lives.  We must resist every step they take to achieve this scenario at all costs.

Richey has done a short piece to camera on Starmer's two tier ban, watch below (two minute watch).

It's not about safety, it's about control.

WHAT IF ED WON (AGAIN)

In his final video filmed over the Bank Holiday weekend, Richey discusses the potential Labour leadership election that haunts Starmer's troubled premiership.  Burnham remains odds on favourite to succeed Starmer across betting markets, followed by Rayner, Miliband and Streeting.

Ladbrokes are currently offering the following odds.

Andy Burnham 4/9

Angela Rayner 6/1

Ed Miliband 11/1

Wes Streeting 14/1

Alistair Carns 20/1

Shabana Mahmood 40/1 

Yvette Cooper 50/1

Watch below or on YouTube (five minute watch)

Of course the Ed Miliband scenario discussed by Richey, can only come about if both he and Burnham stand.  Burnham has to win Makerfield and there are currently no indications as to whether Miliband plans to enter the fray.

CLIMATE SCAMMING OVERDRIVE

In the second of three videos filmed over Bank Holiday weekend, Richey discusses the rampant climate scamming that is currently being deployed by the media.  The attempt to invoke hysteria over a spell of hot weather is all about the globalist agenda for complete control over humanity.  Don't be fooled.

Watch below (seven minute watch)

And right on cue, as Richey discussed, the climate scammers have today used Heathrow yet again to report a 'record breaking temperature'.  Don't be fooled.

ANDY FOR HIMSELF

Richey has been out enjoying the sunshine and recording his insights along the way.  In the first of three videos, here he discusses the travesty that is Andy Burnham - who may well be our next Prime Minister.

Watch below or on YouTube (five minute watch)

Nominations for the Makerfield by-election close on Tuesday at 16:00.  At this moment in time, the Green Party do not have a candidate, as their first choice dropped out on the same day they announced his candidacy.  There are calls from within the party to stand down in order to give Burnham a free run, so Reform will be holding their breath and hoping they do not.  Chances of a Reform victory have already been damaged by Rupert Lowe's decision to debut in Makerfield, so for the Greens to pull out at this late stage certainly won't help their chances.

We said people should be careful for what they wish for, and Burnham's succession of Starmer could be the turning point that resuscitates a party that was not just on life support - it was close to death.

REEVES SNEERS AT 'WHITE VAN MAN'

In echoes of Jeremy Corbyn's 'kinder, gentler politics', Rachel Reeves and a sympathetic media have framed the heckling incident earlier this week as simply 'bad manners'.  In an interview with Channel 4's Helia Ebrahimi on Friday, the Chancellor was set up perfectly in order to repeat this mantra by way of turning it into an attack on Nigel Farage.  The Reform leader had responded to the initial incident by declaring he would 'like to buy this man a pint'.  Reeves refused to be drawn into a personal attack on Farage, but spoke about general courtesy, respect and civil debate over shouting and being 'aggressive'.

It's a bit rich coming from someone who takes part in a shouting and jeering contest every week in the House of Commons.

Watch the clip below (one minute watch)

It's all about taking the moral high ground with Labour at the moment, especially when it comes to the white working class patriots that the party despise.  Keir Starmer used a recent attack on the Unite the Kingdom march to speak about 'our values', suggesting that the marchers were somehow a subhuman element that did not represent Britain.  Reeves echoes this sentiment by referencing her upbringing and suggesting that flags do not maketh oneself a patriot.  The way she spews the words 'flag in your van' is reminiscent and no different from Emily Thornberry's sneering social post about a 'white van man' during a by-election in 2014.

These university-educated snobs have become so detached from the working classes that their party was originally founded to represent.  It's why they are so woefully ill-judged when faced with dissent, whether it be street hecklers, the Leave mandate or the rise of Reform UK.  They keep making the same mistake - smearing the masses with their silly labels and then expressing horror when the masses double down.  For many, there is no way back for Labour after years of sneering and contempt.  As the party has long abandoned this demographic, how else are they to get attention other than scream and shout?  

If you haven't seen the clip of the 'white van man' heckling Red Rachel on the petrol forecourt, it can be seen below.  Technically, he wasn't a 'white van man', as he was driving a pickup truck, but the term 'white van man' is often used as a disparaging slur against working class people.

The man spoke for the nation, Red Rachel speaks only for her Fabian clique of bourgeois Marxists who absolutely do not 'love our country'.

KEIR'S UNITE THE KINGDOM FAIL

Keir Starmer desperately wanted violence to explode on the streets of central London on Saturday afternoon.  Yaxley-Lennon's 'Unite the Kingdom' march was taking place and our embattled PM needed a distraction from his leadership woes.  He also wanted a justification to push through his long threatened crackdown on protests.

With another big rally planned for Saturday from the far left Palestine fan club, the stage was set for a confrontation.  Starmer released a snazzy video the day prior to the marches, using it to attack only Unite the Kingdom.  Ironically, he used the same kind of multi-cultural messages that Yaxley-Lennon himself continually pumps out, while declaring that 'the full force of the law' would be brought to bear when 'hatred manifests as violence'.

If you are suffering from insomnia, Starmer's little address can be seen below (one minute watch)

Unfortunately for Starmer, this 'violence' did not erupt as he had hoped.  In fact there were less arrests at Unite the Kingdom on Saturday than there were during the previous event, held last September.  22 people were arrested at the previous rally.  However, on Saturday there were 20 arrests, although it took some time for the Metropolitan Police to arrive at this figure, with headline numbers of 43 circulating in media on Saturday evening and into Sunday.  It turns out that a dozen of the 43 arrests were made at the Palestine march, with a further 11 arrests apparently nothing to do with either march.

Half of those arrested at Unite the Kingdom were for public order offences, nine of which the Met alleged were 'hate crimes'.  Three arrests were for alleged assaults.  The widescale use of Orwellian facial recognition cameras was also bound to boost arrest numbers at the march, and indeed two of those arrested were in relation to incidents that happened in Birmingham days earlier.  It's all pretty tame compared to, say, the Notting Hill carnival, which usually results in hundreds of arrests and yet is held up by the establishment as a beacon of diversity and multi-culturalism. 

Another fail for our failing Prime Minister.  He can't unite his party, let alone the Kingdom.

WEST STICKS TO HER GUNS

"The voters sent us a very strong message that we are not good enough".  That was Catherine West's justification for her sensational intervention in trying to force Keir Starmer out of Number Ten.  West was speaking to Laura Kuenssberg on Sunday morning, with the BBC presenter making light of her chances.  While it's true, not many Labour MPs have swung behind her move publicly - barely any in fact - many others have said nothing.  This silent majority could spring a surprise on Monday, unless West backs out at the last minute.  She needs 81 comrades to nominate her.

Towards the end of the interview, West was repeatedly asked about reports that allies of other potential leadership candidates had put pressure on her to stand down.  Kuenssberg named Andy Burnham as one of those who had been exerting such pressure.  West repeatedly refused to address the reports and remained steadfast.

Watch below (4 minute watch)

Andy Burnham is probably the only leadership hopeful with a justifiable gripe about West's intervention.  As he is currently on the outside looking in, and cannot participate in a leadership election, he needs more time to enact his reported plan of re-entering the Commons.  However, despite the dust now settling on the election results, no MP has resigned or even signalled their intention to stand aside for him.  Time is not on Burnham's side, especially if West gains the signatures and forces a contest.  A by-election can take up to five weeks to hold and by then it would be too late for Burnham to join the fray.

Other potential challengers have remained tight-lipped since election day, especially Angela Rayner.  She has not posted any response at all to Labour's mauling.  If she and Wes Streeting are serious about succeeding Starmer, they have the most to gain from West's intervention.  The one drawback is that MPs can only nominate one candidate, so it could potentially be very difficult for either of them to gain enough signatures if West successfully collects 81 names herself.

Will either of them strike first in order to head off a potential threat from Burnham?  The silence is deafening.

RICHEY'S ELECTION REVIEW

Due to a combination of work commitments, illness and the absurdly staggered timing of election counts, we could not pull an all nighter on Thursday - as we have in the past.  The process of counting votes and then declaring results a few hours after the polls close seems to be getting more scarce in recent years.  This week the overwhelming majority of English councils joined Scotland and Wales in deferring their counts until the following day.  This rendered an 'all nighter' pointless and with work commitments standing in Karl's way and illness hindering Richey, a full programme of coverage on this website was very difficult indeed.

Instead, we tried our best to cover the election on our social media accounts and succeeded in communicating the main points, which resulted in impressive distribution and engagement.  In place of our usual election coverage on binlabour.com, Richey has recorded a video review - under difficult circumstances.  He is currently suffering from a horrendous cough that has lingered from a recent chest infection, not helped by little sleep during these staggered election counts.  Multiple takes due to this cough delayed the release of the video.  By the time Karl had received and edited the files, the election and its fallout had progressed further.  Therefore, the declarations of Bradford City Council and Tower Hamlets had come and gone by the time the video was posted.  The Catherine West ultimatum had also come and gone.

Regardless, the review is still relevant and you are welcome to watch below (18 minute watch)

If you appreciate what we do - in dedicating a significant (and often unhealthy) amount of our spare time to this campaign - please consider visiting this website and bunging us a few quid.  With millions of hits on our website and over a hundred thousand followers on social media, it sure can feel like we are wholly unappreciated most of the time.  It costs money as well as time to do this, so please support us.

Thank you.

BACKBENCHER THROWS DOWN THE GAUNTLET

Labour backbencher Catherine West has declared that she will challenge Keir Starmer for the leadership if no-one else comes forward by Monday morning.  This is the biggest development yet in the fall out from Thursday's election mauling, albeit not quite what many had envisaged when it came to the process of ousting Starmer.

Clearly frustrated by the lack of movement since the full election horror unfolded on Friday, West informed the BBC of her intention.  She refused to name a preferred successor to Starmer, but appeared to confirm that there are multiple plotters already circulating: "I think there are several people who would like to do it, who have been planning for months, but I'm very surprised that none of them has popped up today to say ‘I will do it’."

She continued: "Keir has done excellent work rebuilding the Labour party and on foreign policy, but what we do worry about is taking the fight to Reform on the domestic agenda, which I think he has less of a grip of, and also trying to identify traditional Labour voters who we've lost so that we can get them back on side and we can win the country in the 2029 general election.  We can't just go on with our main spokesperson being Keir."

Watch the moment she drops the leadership bombshell below.

West could potentially be a stalking horse for one of the plotters, throwing her name in the hat so they can join the contest at a later date, after which she drops out - having served her purpose.  That is what will probably happen anyway, even if she is acting unilaterally out of genuine frustration.

West has been the MP for the north London constituency of Hornsey and Friern Barnet (formerly Hornsey and Wood Green) since 2015.  Before becoming an MP she served on Islington Borough Council and was the council leader between 2010 and 2013.  She is a staunch Remainer and a Fabian, just like the man she is trying to force out.  She served on the front benches under both Corbyn and Starmer, but has been a backbench MP since leaving the government in last September's cabinet reshuffle.

Just like most of her comrades, West is from a bourgeois background.  She is the daughter of schoolteachers, was privately educated and is a university graduate.  She was born and bred in Australia, having only moved to the UK in 1998.  Her first role in the Labour party was as a caseworker for Tottenham MP Dave Lammy.

If no-one meets her ultimatum and she seeks to challenge Starmer on Monday, she will need the backing of 81 colleagues in Westminster to do so.

THE UXBRIDGE/GOLDERS GREEN DISPARITY

The stabbing rampage against Jews in Golders Green has provoked a massive response from the state and Keir Starmer in particular.  Shamefully, when an Afghan migrant went on a stabbing spree elsewhere in London last year, the response was a deafening silence from our Prime Minister.  That despicable triple attack resulted in a brutal murder - that of innocent dog walker Wayne Broadhurst - something which did not even constitute a Wikipedia entry.  Starmer said nothing, Sadiq Khan said nothing, Labour said nothing.

Contrast with Golders Green, where two people were stabbed and no-one died, but which has been designated a 'terror attack' and sparked a COBRA meeting, a press conference and a visit to the scene of the crime by Two Tier Keir.

Richey's thoughts on this disparity can be seen below (five minute watch)

EJECTED FROM THE HOUSE OF LIES

Zarah Sultana and Lee Anderson would normally hold each other in the utmost of contempt, but on Monday the Commons watched as both of them were removed from the chamber for accusing the PM of lying.  It's a rare occasion in itself for one MP to be ordered out, but one after the other in the same sitting is almost unheard of.

MPs were responding to a statement from Keir Starmer in relation to the Mandelson scandal, in which he pointed the finger of blame at the Foreign Office and continued to deny any wrongdoing.  Reform's Lee Anderson told the PM that 'no-one believed him' and accused him of 'lying'.  Starmer stood hesitantly, while looking towards the Speaker, but Lindsay Hoyle was slow to react.  Eventually, Lindsay Hoyle interjected and told Anderson that 'we don't use those words' and asked him to withdraw his accusation.  In true Anderson style, the Ashfield MP doubled down and refused, adding: "That man couldn't lie straight in bed".

The Speaker then ordered Anderson out of the chamber.  Watch the exchange below.

A short while later the chamber was treated to the juvenile screeching of Your Party's Zarah Sultana.  Sultana's prepared statement accused Starmer of 'gaslighting the nation', before she accused him of being a 'bare-faced liar'.  She appeared to be about to demand his resignation when her microphone was cut and the Speaker interrupted.  On this occasion Hoyle was clearly upset and immediately demanded her departure.  With her microphone cut, her protestations about 'serving the interests of her constituents' was barely audible, but did nothing to placate Hoyle's ire.

Hoyle gave her multiple opportunities to comply, but like Anderson she doubled down and could be heard saying: "The Prime Minister is a liar".  However, whereas Anderson duly left the chamber, Sultana's repeated refusal led to her being 'named' by the Speaker.  This process means that Sultana is now suspended from the Commons for a period of several days (usually five), during which her salary is also put on hold.

As her statement appeared to be written in advance, this was probably a pre-conceived publicity stunt that Anderson had unwittingly usurped by being ejected first.  Whether or not she had initially intended to push the Speaker so far is not clear, but with Anderson having left in such a dignified manner, she may have wished to up the ante for maximum attention.

Watch the exchange below.

It never ceases to amaze how such a setting - frequented by hundreds of professional liars - can have such a process in place that punishes those who accuse colleagues of lying!

HM PRISON ABOLITION

Pink-haired weirdo Kate Nevens is one of the Green candidates for the Scottish Parliament regional list of Edinburgh and Lothians East.  In a campaign video posted to her Bluesky account (where else?) she discusses her desire to abolish the prison system: "Prisons are not safe, they're violent and they're poor for people's wellbeing".  Er, yeah, they're full of criminals you muppet.  They are where we send people who have been very, very naughty - as a punishment, a deterrent and to keep the rest of us safe.  Every single country on this planet has a prison system.

Prisons are not meant to be pleasant holiday homes you wet liberal, that would defeat their very purpose.  Needless to say, Kate is from the same university-educated class that turns a blind eye to all manner of crime, with the exception of the thought crimes they refer to as 'hate speech'.  As well as legalising hard drugs, she would probably decriminalise rape gangs in the name of progress and atonement for the colonial spread of the British Empire.

Watch Kate's prison pitch below, with Richey's input (four minute watch).

The Green Party is polling nationally at 16 per cent, level with Labour, according to the most recent YouGov poll,

HAPPY EASTER

We had no plans for an Easter video this year, but then Richey's girlfriend surprises him with the generic chocolate eggs (again).  A hastily produced video ensued...

LONDON CLOWN SHOW 2026

Karl has been busier than usual on YouTube in the past week, thanks to some spare time.  Over several days he managed to compile a montage of clips from the big London march last weekend, introduced by none other than Claudia Webbe.  Remember her?

She was the short-lived Labour MP for Leicester East who was stripped of the party whip less than twelve months into her term as successor to the equally controversial Keith Vaz.  Having been found guilty of harassment, she escaped a recall petition by virtue of a suspended sentence and limped on as an independent to the 2024 election.  Thanks to her refusal to let go of the Westminster gravy train, she managed to deliver the only Conservative gain of that election by standing as an independent - holding onto more than half the Labour vote and turning the seat blue for the first time since 1987.

Anyway, if you want a good laugh at the depraved left - watch this video...

SIR QUEER AND THE TERRORIST

We had a bit of fun with Ahmed al-Sharaa's controversial visit to Downing Street last week.  Make what you will of Richey's voiceover work here...

DOUBLING DOWN ON 20

Of all Labour's oppressive nanny state laws throughout the history of our nation, there are seldom few more unpopular than the blanket 20mph mandate in Wales.  Although the policy did feature in their 2021 Senedd manifesto, the reality for drivers when it was introduced two years later has been insufferable.  Longer journey times, increased traffic, an even greater threat of speeding fines and all round frustration.

As Labour looks set to fall from its 27 year grip on the Senedd, its politicians are beginning to reflect on the inevitable.  Of course they are not issuing any apologies, in fact quite the opposite - the narcissist control freaks are doubling down.  Ex-first minister Mark Drakeford told WalesOnline last week that he had 'no regrets' over Labour policies, including the 20mph mandate.  He said:  "We know from the latest figures there are people alive today who would not have been alive if we hadn't changed that."

He goes on to say that there have been '100 fewer life-changing accidents' as a result of the policy.  His colleague Julie James echoed the claim in a defence of the policy last week.  Addressing the Senedd, the minister said people opposed to the policy 'should be thoroughly ashamed', while making the bizarre claim that 'women and children' were now safer (apparently men's lives don't matter).  However, what Drakeford, James and their comrades conveniently fail to factor in is that ambulance times - in fact response times of all the emergency services - has increased thanks to growing congestion and heavier traffic resulting from the policy.  How many lives has that cost?

And what about the claim that the policy has 'cleaned up the air'?  James made the claim twice in her speech, without zero evidence to support it.  Repeated studies have found that the policy has had virtually zero effect on air pollution.  We would argue that increased road congestion, with engines idling in stationary traffic, cannot possibly result in 'cleaner air' - in fact quite the opposite.

Watch the clip below (one minute watch)

Of course the saddest thing about the outcome of the 2026 Senedd election is that despite Labour's demise, nothing will change.  Welsh voters look set to replace Labour with an equally damaging leftist successor - Plaid Cymru.  Worse still, Plaid will probably have to reach out to other leftist parties in order to form some kind of coalition government.  This could include Labour, but there will also be an option to include the Greens.  All three parties strongly support the 20mph policy, while the Greens want even tighter restrictions on motorists in order to get them off the road entirely.

Both Reform and the Conservatives have pledged to scrap the 20mph policy.  Hopefully, Welsh voters will wake up before May, but the likelihood suggests they face yet another five years of nanny state policies.  Vote better next time!

TOMINEY SKEWERS REED

Labour and their media chums have really tried to drag out Nick Timothy's remarks on the Islamist takeover of Trafalgar Square, as if he had said something that would horrify the masses.  Thanks to the stunning shift to the right this country is currently undergoing, the MP is not only still on Kemi Badenoch's front bench, but he has doubled down on social media and in newspaper columns.  There has been no quivering apology or backtracking from the Shadow Justice Secretary.  Bravo, sir.

Through the rise of free speech platforms and the establishment of right-leaning broadcasters, the establishment is more exposed than ever to public ridicule.  Step forward, Steve Reed.  The Housing Secretary and London MP has heaped praise on the Muslim community in recent weeks, while calling for the head of Nick Timothy.  However, Camilla Tominey was having none of it when she spoke to Reed on her GB News show yesterday.

The poker-faced presenter delivered a series of awkward questions to Reed, who began in animated fashion as he tried to accuse Timothy of 'singling out Muslims' and being 'racist'.  Deliberately missing the point, Reed omits to mention that Timothy's now infamous X post specifically refers to the Adhan prayer, which exerts Islamic dominance over all other faiths.  Adherents of other faiths don't appear to share the desperation for mass public displays of domination, with a tiny gathering of Hindus outside Downing Street at Rishi Sunak's invitation hardly comparable.

As for that establishment buzz word to silence opponents, the accusation of 'racism' is wearing thin and when applied to Muslims is laughably inaccurate.  What 'race' are Muslims then, Mr Reed?

Tominey goes on to skewer Reed over the segregation of women at the Trafalgar Square event, before delivering a final retort about Zack Polanski running Labour's front bench.

Watch the clip below (two minute watch)

A perfectly timed attack on London's Jewish community over the weekend also drew attention to the hypocrisy of the likes of Starmer, Streeting, Reed and Polanski.  They all revelled in Iftar events recently, flooding their social media with glowing posts praising Islam.  They all support the ongoing colonisation and replacement of the native peoples of this island.

And with straight faces, they all poured their hearts out over the attack on the Jewish ambulances, which was almost certainly carried out by Islamists - either Shia or Sunni, it is not yet clear.  It's like throwing a fox into a henhouse and then decrying the fact it has slaughtered all the poultry therein.

Diversity is not strength, it is importing conflicts from around the world and destroying the very fabric of this nation.

KHAN'S EU MEMBERSHIP DRIVE

Sadiq Khan has revisited one of his favourite gripes this week - the quest to drag Britain back into the European Union.  Interviewed by a reporter from Italian left-wing rag La Repubblica, Khan claimed that he witnessed 'every day' the harms done to London and Londoners 'economically, socially and culturally'.  Cultural harm?  What on earth is he talking about?

Khan goes on to make a dubious and wholly unproven claim about Brexit having cost the UK economy 'ten per cent', which has grown from previous estimates ranging from 5-8 per cent.  At no point during the interview does he mention the Covid-19 shitshow, which happened to almost coincide with Britain's exit from the EU (the first lockdown came just seven weeks later).  Has there ever been a bigger act of self harm to Britain's economy than the decision to trash our own economy, creating a cost of lockdown crisis that is still making Brits poorer today?

Where the EU is concerned, Khan does not pull any punches.  He wants us back in the customs union and single market 'this Parliament' and suggests that Labour should fight the next election on full EU membership, which by having rejoined its main institutions we will have already effectively rejoined prior to that election.

Khan somehow goes on to bring President Trump into the equation (he just can't help himself).  However, the first thing he mentions - tariffs - actually benefits the UK being independent of the EU.  When Trump imposed his tariffs last year, he gave Britain a favourable baseline of ten per cent, as opposed to the 15 per cent he dished out to the EU.  Whereas the EU faced 50 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium, Britain negotiated a significantly reduced figure of 25 per cent - the lowest in the world.  If we had been a fully fledged EU member state, as Khan desperately wants, we would have been lumbered with those eminently more costly EU tariffs.

He does make some valid points about the war on Iran, not least its exacerbation of an already painful cost of living for average Brits.

Watch the clip below (five minute watch)

Note his repeated reference to 'Londoners' leaving the city due to Brexit, which 'breaks his heart'.  He emphasises the word 'Londoners', but then states in the next breath that they are actually EU nationals.  So, not Londoners then!  Where are they going Sadiq?  That's right, they're going home to mainland Europe, from whence they came.  This ties into Khan's enthusiasm for abolishing borders and nations, by making anyone and everyone the same.  If anyone can be a 'Londoner', simply by sailing into the Channel or driving under it and then rocking up in our nation's capital, then Londoners have no identity.  The same can be said for Britons and attempts to name anyone and everyone English or Scots or Welsh, despite the fact our native peoples are precisely that - distinct ethnic European groups that are native to these islands.

People that have no identity, culture or history are easier to placate and enslave into the globalist agenda driven by people like Khan.

DIVERSITY IS STRENGTH: NY EDITION

'Diversity Is Strength' will go down in history as the biggest Marxist propaganda lie of the century.  As migrant communities continue to grow across the West, street crime and terror spiral.  And every time something particularly horrific happens, the left roll out their contradictory slogan in response.

Last weekend a protest was held outside the home of the Mayor of New York, in what has been described as an anti-Islam gathering.  Naturally, the hard left assembled a counter protest and one of those present was a 'comedian' by the name of Walter Masterson.  Masterson was in the middle of a 'diversity is strength' speech when a pair of Islamist terrorists tried to bomb the opposing march, one of them literally using Masterson's back as a launchpad to hurl one of the crude devices.

Fortunately, neither of the two IEDs exploded and the two men were arrested.  Media coverage of the incident deliberately misrepresented what had happened by trying to conflate the presence of the right-wingers and suggesting that the target had been Zohran Mamdani, the city's hard left Muslim mayor.  

Watch below (two minute watch)

Masterson has predictably been rinsed on social media, with many daubing him a 'useful idiot' whose ideology is totally at odds with the people he is trying to excuse.  A little bit like the Green Party here in the UK right now...

ROSS KEMP'S INCEL REVELATION

When Ross Kemp's acting career died out in the 2000s, he turned his hand to documentaries.  The EastEnders actor has been making them for more than two decades now, with his latest effort being Lost Boys, Deadly Men.  This series features Ross delving into the subculture of 'incels' - a group we can best describe in layman's terms as loners who can't get laid and blame women as a result.

Ross had a preconceived notion of incels before embarking on the documentary.  He categorised them as white and right-wing, responsible for killing 'lots of girls' and posing a 'permanent threat to Britain's security'.  Unfortunately for Ross, that preconception was demolished in humiliating fashion by a leading expert in the field.  A clip from the documentary, suggesting that perhaps he should have abandoned it altogether, shows the moment he is stunned into confused silence when researcher William Costello informs him that there have been no more than 15 incel killers across the entire world.

Watch the clip below (two minute watch)

Further revelations uncovered by the documentary are to heap further ridicule on Mr Kemp's assertions.  Firstly, he couldn't actually locate any 'far right' incels, with all the participants in the documentary describing themselves as being centre-left to left-wing.  He also found that 42 per cent of incels based in the UK and US are from non-white ethnic groups, again contradicting his preconception.  Barely one per cent of individuals referred to the UK government's 'Prevent' anti-terror scheme are incels.  Furthermore, another study informed Kemp that around 80 per cent of incels completely reject violence.

Did he not think to conduct a single piece of research before he began filming?  That is, beyond watching the absurd Netflix drama Adolescence?

Perhaps Ross would have found more fertile ground documenting a real 'permanent threat' to our security - the Islamist fifth column that has raped thousands of girls, butchered people in the street and murdered little girls in bombings and other massacres in the UK that number significantly more than the 59 people killed globally by incels.

Of course that would be a non-starter for Ross.  He's a staunch Labour supporter and has actively campaigned for the party in multiple elections over the years, most recently taking part in telephone canvassing alongside Chairman Starmer ahead of last May's local elections.

Like Starmer, Kemp seems to think that the totally fictional Adolescence is a reflection of real life.  Starmer has even referred to it as a 'documentary' more than once on the floor of the Commons.  Sadly, privileged buffoons are taken in by a narrative they find only too comfortable to accept from within their gated woke liberal communities.  They don't want to confront the reality that the rest of us have to endure on a daily basis.